Lombard Risk Management (“LRM”) develops risk management and regulatory compliance software and licenses this software to financial institutions.
Risk Management
The risk management business is long established and consists mainly of COLLINE, a collateral management product, and OBERON, an institutional trading software product.
When banks and businesses lend to each other some kind of collateral is often required in order to reduce counter-party risk exposure. The types and varieties of collateral have become ever more complex over time. “COLLINE”, Lombard Risk’s 10 year old collateral management product, helps lenders keep track of these. COLLINE is licensed to about 50 financial institutions – including Northern Trust and Société Générale – and is probably the leading product in its niche.
OBERON is software for processing, valuation and risk management of trades involving interest rate and inflation derivatives, currencies, and money market and fixed income securities. Its pedigree is longer than COLLINE's and dates back to 1996, is accordingly well-established. Mature enterprise software products tend to be characterized by stable revenue streams and high margins, and management reports that OBERON enjoys just that.
In any case, the Risk Management segment looks like this:
In any case, the Risk Management segment looks like this:
Regulatory Compliance
Regulatory Compliance is the segment that presents LRM with strong, sustained growth opportunities as the regulatory directives such as COREP & FINREP, Dodd-Frank, EMIR, Basel III's CRD IV and CRR, and so on, take hold in the immediate and medium terms.
Needless to say, reporting requirements are about to become a great deal more complex and comprehensive than they were, and Excel and scratch paper will no longer cut it.
.jpeg)
COREP: 10x times the data
Regulatory Compliance is the segment that presents LRM with strong, sustained growth opportunities as the regulatory directives such as COREP & FINREP, Dodd-Frank, EMIR, Basel III's CRD IV and CRR, and so on, take hold in the immediate and medium terms.
Needless to say, reporting requirements are about to become a great deal more complex and comprehensive than they were, and Excel and scratch paper will no longer cut it.
.jpeg)
LRM, already the leading provider of compliance and regulatory reporting software in the United Kingdom (and among foreign banks in the US), stands to benefit.
That it stood to benefit was not so obvious in years past, at least to me: the very complexity of the reporting requirements may have led one to reasonably suspect that financial institutions would call in the Accentures and the Moody's Analytics of this world who would then sell their partners' or their own software solutions, leaving LRM out in the cold. It hasn't turned out that way: LRM is taking share and is signing up new clients at a fast clip.
This is what the Compliance segment looks like:
Looks measly doesn't it? That's where the opportunity comes from.
LRM (along with most enterprise software companies) reports revenue on a percentage of completion basis and the finalization of the COREP/FINREP regulations was delayed by 9 months to January 1st 2014. Lombard Risk's fiscal year runs from March to March, so the revenue recognition from the clients won thus far will be mostly recognized in the second half of the year.
The Big Picture
There is, at the same time, a great deal of operating leverage at work: ~75% of the company's current costs are fixed meaning that incremental revenue above, say, 9.5 to 10 million largely drops to the bottom line. This is what the operating leverage looks like on a consolidated basis:
and this is what the consolidated income statement should more or less look like:
We know that the company is more than half way through its major software development program, so we can deduce that capitalized development expenditure will look like this:
and free cash flow will look something like this:
Management
It is clear that LRM's sweet spot is at the junction of risk and compliance and management is therefore in a tricky, game-theoretic spot. It would like to see itself as a consolidator in that specialty and is evidently averse to debt. It would therefore like a strong share price as currency for so-called "tuck-in" acquisitions and it is perhaps this that has led them to talk up the value of the company -- not quite to the point of vulgarity but not far from it, either.
In any case, I don't doubt that, in the final analysis, they could sell the company for two or three times its current valuation if they chose. (IDOX, after all, was spun out from LRM; they are no strangers to the M&A market).
Value
LRM is worth more than its current market cap. Given its growth profile, 5 year contracts, and 95% client retention rate, 10x 2016 EBIT is probably at the low end of fair value, giving the shares a reasonable 100% to 150% upside.
Disclosure: I own some shares in LRM
